The Betelgeuse happens to be the second brightest star, am I correct? Thus what is brighter than the Betelgeuse?|||I don't know about those other stars but Vega is the brightest Pole Star yet it's not even the current Pole Star.|||Rigel is brighter in apparent magnitude.
The Bayer-Flamsteed designations are not solely based in order of apparent magnitude. Bayer likely knew Rigel was brighter. What he did was list all the stars of first magntude in one column, and lettered them from Norheast (Betelgeuse) to Sothwest (Rigel).
There are 28 constellations with their brightest star that do not have the alpha designation:
Beta Orionis (Rigel)
Beta Crucis (Mimosa)
Epsilon Ursae Majoris (Alioth)
Gamma Velorum (Suhail al Muhlif)
Epsilon Sagittarii (Kaus Australis)
Beta Ceti (Deneb Kaitos)
Gamma Draconis
Zeta Puppis (Naos)
Epsilon Pegasi (Enif)
Gamma Corvi (Gienah Ghurab)
Beta Librae(Zubenelschemali)
Beta Herculi (Kornephoros)
Beta Hydri
Beta Arae
Delta Capricorni (Deneb Algedi)
Beta Aquarii (Sadal Sud)
Beta Trianguli
Gamma Sagittae
Beta Cancri
Delta Crateris
Eta Piscium
Beta Delphini
Nu Octantis
Beta Volantis
46Leo Minoris
Gamma Normae
Beta Camelopardalis
Gamma Microscopii|||Rigel is actually brighter than Betelgeuse of all stars in the Orion constellation, but there are six other stars even brighter than that in other constellations. Here's the list:
Sun (duh)
Sirius
Canopus
Alpha Centauri
Arcturus
Vega
Capella
Rigel
Procyon
Achernar
Betelgeuse
Hope this helps...
%26gt; Jimmer %26lt;|||Jimmer is right,
For some reason they thought Betelgeuse was brighter when the called ir Alpha 200 years ago, perhaps it was then|||Sirius is the brightest star we can see with our naked eye. Well besides our own star.|||In terms of absolute or apparent magnitude?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment